Cooperatove Conservation Project
COOPERATIVE CONSERVATION CASE STUDY

Mitchell River Coalition

Thousands of acres protected, miles of streams and rivers restored, one of North Carolina’s Outstanding Resource Waters improved and protected for future generations.

Location: Southeastern Region: North Carolina

Project Summary: The Mitchell River Coalition came together to protect and improve the watershed and water quality of the Mitchell River.
Click for Full Size
This riparian area, once an eroded stream bank, was restored and placed in a permanent easement. Photo by Dick Everhart, USDA-NRCS.
Resource Challenge

The upper Mitchell River has excellent water quality.  A planned high density development at its headwaters raised the concern of local citizens.  Sediment and fecal coliform were identified by the state as the main water quality problems in several of the major tributaries in the lower Mitchell River .  An assessment of the watershed showed that streambank erosion, livestock and the potential for uncontrolled development were the main water quality concerns in the watershed.  Stream restoration was a new science and there was only limited funding available to carry it out.  Livestock BMPs and the concept of fencing cows out of streams and rivers were not widely accepted.  There was no land use plan, no public land and no active effort to protect land with conservation easements.

The upper Mitchell River has excellent water quality.  A planned high density development at its headwaters raised the concern of local citizens.  Sediment and fecal coliform were identified by the state as the main water quality problems in several of the major tributaries in the lower Mitchell River .  An assessment of the watershed showed that streambank erosion, livestock and the potential for uncontrolled development were the main water quality concerns in the watershed.  Stream restoration was a new science and there was only limited funding available to carry it out.  Livestock BMPs and the concept of fencing cows out of streams and rivers were not widely accepted.  There was no land use plan, no public land and no active effort to protect land with conservation easements.

Examples of Key Partners
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Piedmont Land Conservancy, Surry Soil and Water Conservation District, NC Cooperative Extension Service-Surry Center, NC Division of Water Resources, Clean Water Management Trust Fund, Pilot View Resource Conservation and Development, Inc, Stone Mountain Chapter Trout Unlimited, Weyerhaeuser, and the US Fish and Wildlife Service
Results and Accomplishments
These stream restoration projects have immediate water quality benefits by reducing sediment from streambank erosion.  A recently completed project restored over 5,000 feet of stream that had contributed 5,000 tons of sediment to the river in 2004.  The Coalition’s efforts have resulted in a higher density of stream restoration projects than anywhere else in NC.
Innovation/Highlight

The Surry SWCD initiated the use of donated conservation easements as the landowner’s contribution on stream restoration projects. In return state agencies will fund 100% of the cost of design and installing the project. This insures that regardless of the financial well being of the landowner, the stream restoration project can be carried out.

Project Contact
Dick Everhart
District Conservationist
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
P.O. Box 218
Dobson, NC 27017
(336) 386-8751x3
Richard.Everhart@nc.usda.gov






Website:

To request additions or corrections to this case study email the Administrator